Cummins Marine Diesel Repower Specialists Forums General Discussion Perplexed! Performance/Propping my 6CTA’s

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #156165

    Brian Kelly
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Water-Boarded
    Engines: 6CTA
    Location: Rhode Island
    Country: USA

    Hey guys, I purchased my Formula 41PC with twin 6CTA’s a little over 2 years ago now and I have been absolutely struggling to get my RPM’s and props dialed in. The boat had a set of 5 blade’s on her that were only reaching 2400 RPM’s and after reading all of Tony’s Tips related to propping and revs I knew this was nowhere even close. My spare set of Michigan 4 blades got me a bit closer at 2500 rpms and after giving my specs/numbers to ACME propellers, they made me a set to achieve 2700 rpms and I am still only getting about 2600 (with full tanks). I am baffled as to what’s going on or what steps I should take next. The motors are in very good working order, pressures/temps are great and they run strong with no obvious issues. The cooling/aftercooler systems have been maintained very well and are flushed and inspected annually. I am just at a loss at this point on where to go next. Additionally, I have a sister boat in the same bay as me here in Rhode Island with essentially the exact same specs sans different exhaust setups and his seems to be performing where I would expect to be at. We even have the same prop tuning shop so we know our shared prop measurements/data is accurate/precise. I charted out a propeller data sheet below for my boat with the 3 sets of props I have tried and his “sister” boat for comparison. All data is listed below. Any help is welcomed!

    <u>1999 Formula 41PC ā€œWater-Boardedā€ Propeller reference sheet. </u>

    Powered by 1998 6CTA 8.3M3 rated 450hp @ 2600rpm (2172 cpl) Port motor is original and has roughly 2500 hours, Starboard motor is rebuilt and has approximately 100 hours.Ā 

    Captain Brian Kelly ā€“ 508-269-04642

    Notes:

    1. ALL SPEEDS ARE IN KNOTS
    2. N/A = Not Achieved, blank = Unknown/no data
    3. All tests performed in similar conditions, similar loadout, engine syncā€™s OFF
    4. All speeds listed are averages of multiple tests to ensure accuracy
    5. Engines are properly maintained and have NO performance difference between time of tests. Turbos spooling at 1600rpms and appear to be making good power, recent oil samples from last year normal
    6. Ralph Vickery ā€œsister boatā€ is exact same hull, model, layout/outfit, engines, transmission and gear ratio, for reference. ONLY difference in spec is Ralphā€™s sister boat has underwater exhaust exits bottom of keel. Mine has lifted mufflers with side exhaust.

    RPMs

    Michigan Dyna 4 blade

    Ā 

    23×22.5

    ACME

    4 blade

    Ā 

    22×22

    Teignbridge

    5 blade

    Ā 

    22×24

    Ralph Vickery

    4 blade S&S Katapult

    22×25.5

    1600

    14 kts

    10 kts

     

     

    1800

    18 kts

    13 kts

    15 kts

     

    1900

    20 kts

    15 kts

    17 kts

    23 kts

    2000

    21 kts

    16 kts

    18 kts

     

    2100

    22 kts

    19 kts

    20 kts

     

    2200

    24 kts

    22 kts

    23 kts

    27 kts

    2300

    26 kts

    23 kts

    24 kts

     

    2400

    27 kts

    24 kts

    25 kts

     

    2500

    28 kts

    26 kts

    N/A

     

    2590

    N/A

    27 kts

    N/A

     

    2650

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    32 kts

    2700

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A

     

     

    Some of the questions I am left with after reviewing this data…

    1. Could timing a contributing problem?
    2. Should throttle levers hit throttle stop on fuel pump?
    3. Maximum revs in neutral – I’m getting Port 2800 and Starboard 2700 ā€“ could this be contributing?
    4. Could this be due to aneroid adjustment?
    5. Ā Am I not making full boost? Are the turbos just tired even though they’re spooling at 1600revs?
Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #156275

    bluebyu
    Participant
    Location: East Coast
    Country: USA

    From this site, boost port: https://www.sbmar.com/articles/boost-fitting-locations-for-b-c-series-marine-diesels/ I see 28 to 31 PSI on our boost gauges (6CTA8.3-M3)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #156254

    Brian Kelly
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Water-Boarded
    Engines: 6CTA
    Location: Rhode Island
    Country: USA

    Tony,Ā 

    Of course I know no two boats are ever the same, the stark differences in speeds and RPM’s just really stood out to me.

     

    I lasered the motors to make sure the tachs are accurate and they are, my starboard tach is dead on the port tach is about 25-40 rpms off at times but never any worse than that.Ā 

     

    Boost gauge is a great idea, is there an easy spot to install one without having to drill into any manifolds? and how much PSI should I be looking for?

    #156214

    Tony Athens
    Moderator
    Vessel Name: Local Banks
    Engines: QSB 6.7 550 HP
    Location: Oxnard, CA
    Country: USA

    ThreeĀ  quickies:

     

    Not ever are two boats the same

     

    Throttle levers MUST hit the stop on the P7100 pumpĀ  solid,Ā  and NO-load should be right at 2950-3050 RPM–Tachs are accurate?

     

    Ā  Let’s get good WOT and 2100- 2200 RPM boost numbers–Use an accurate – 0-30 /0-60 PSI gauge

    #156212

    JimmyK
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Incognito
    Engines: 2 x 6BTA 370s
    Location: Boston
    Country: US

    I see Gene’s point and it is valid.Ā  The engines have nothing to do with speed at a given rpm.Ā  That is a function of the gear ratio, props, and boat (bottom design, weight, etc), but not engine (aside from engine weight).Ā  You have to understand and accept that before going any further.Ā  The engine can dictate what rpm can be reached but not the speed achieved at that rpm.

    With that said, it seems clear you have two problems compared to your friend’s boat.Ā 

    One is what Gene describes–there is at least one significant difference between your boat and your friend’s boat totally outside the engines.Ā  Props are different, but are yours that much less efficient?Ā  Doubtful IMO.Ā  Weight would be number 1 suspect.Ā  Some boats are like some people and have a habit of gaining weight.

    On the other hand, it seems clear to me that you also have something going on with the motors.Ā  They are likely not making full power.Ā  I would start by trying to figure out why they will not reach rated RPM in neutral.Ā  This has nothing to do with the aneroid or turbo.Ā  As said above, number one suspect would be something going on with the injection pump.

    #156205

    Gene Fuller
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Yorkshire Rose
    Engines: QSB5.9 380
    Location: Punta Gorda, Florida
    Country: USA

    I’ll try again.

    If the tachs and speeds are accurate the differences in the following excerpt cannot be related to engine performance in any way. It is possible your “corrections” are not quite right or there are real “non-engine” differences.

     

    #156201

    Brian Kelly
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Water-Boarded
    Engines: 6CTA
    Location: Rhode Island
    Country: USA

    Gene, thanks for your response. If you read in my original post, it says we corrected for conditions, boat setup, loadout, etc. All speeds were done at similar conditions (between 1/2- Full tank) and the boats are spec’d out identical aside from style of exhaust. I cannot ascertain peak RPM’s which could be due to propping but also could be due to engine performance which in my case seems more likely.Ā 

    #156200

    Gene Fuller
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Yorkshire Rose
    Engines: QSB5.9 380
    Location: Punta Gorda, Florida
    Country: USA

    You may be chasing the wrong issue.

    At a given RPM, such as 2200, any differences in speed are NOT due to the engines. Your friend’s boat may be lighter, better trimmed, cleaner, more efficient props, etc. etc.

    There could be engine problems, of course, in addition to the boat differences.

    #156196

    Brian Kelly
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Water-Boarded
    Engines: 6CTA
    Location: Rhode Island
    Country: USA

    How were your problems similar? What exactly was wrong with your injection pumps? What was done to ā€œfreshen them upā€? What improvement did you see after this work was done? Do you have any numbers

    #156195

    Brian Kelly
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Water-Boarded
    Engines: 6CTA
    Location: Rhode Island
    Country: USA

    How were your problems similar? What exactly was wrong with your injection pumps? What was done to “freshen them up”? What improvement did you see after this work was done? Do you have any numbers

    #156176

    Nathan Brady
    Participant
    Vessel Name: Checkmate
    Engines: 450hp 6cta
    Location: Cape canaveral, Fl
    Country: USA

    Both engines are coming up short on rpm in neutral. Being the same age probably have lazy gov springs or whatnot in the injection pumps. I chased my tail with the same issue before, find a good shop that can overhaul and injection pump and let them basically freshen them io and tune them in. You should see at least 2900 unloaded from what Iā€™ve researched and personally i see just over 3000 rpm on my 6cta.Ā 

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.