Cummins Marine Diesel Repower Specialists Forums Cummins Marine Engines '03 6CTA 480ce vs '06 QSC 540, which preferred

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #67396

    John
    Participant
    Engines: QSCs
    Location: NYC
    Country: USA

    First, love the forum and thanks to everyone who participates. Such great reads and info.

    Looking at two boats, one with a 2003 480 550 hours and the other with a 2006 QSC with about 1,000 hrs.

    Both seem to have been maintained evenly and are clean. I know about the 480’s 23 gph rule at 2,200 RPM and the turbo and aftercooler don’t show the extreme discoloration you can see in some pics on this site.

    Don’t know much about the QSC’s though (except owner replaced one turbo) and trying to get a feel for how much better one may be over the other or if they are about the same in terms of reliability/dependability.

    All the best and thanks in advance.

    J

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #68057

    John
    Participant
    Engines: QSCs
    Location: NYC
    Country: USA

    Thank you Rob…

    No pics, sorry. Both motors are generally clean and appear in good cond. The QSC is all orig. The 6CTA had the exhaust redone, adding a hump in it to prevent water ingestion and looks quite well done.

    J

    #67446

    Rob Schepis
    Forum Moderator
    Vessel Name: Tenacious
    Engines: 6BTA 5.9 330's - "Seaboard Style"
    Location: Long Island, NY
    Country: USA

    The QSC is a step (many steps) above. Turbo replaced at 1,000hrs. It clearly was “taken out” by something other than engine hours. Have any pictures to share?

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.